Great writing can still be held back by quiet technical problems: a missing title, a broken heading order, a page that cannot be indexed. Maya reviews those signals against established standards and reports findings by category, so nothing technical is left to chance.
For editors and website teams who want a clear, standards-backed read on a page before it goes live.
Technical issues rarely announce themselves. A page with a missing meta title, headings that skip levels, or an accidental noindex can read perfectly while quietly underperforming. Maya reviews these signals against standards and reports what needs attention, in plain language.
↘ reads fine, set to noindexHeading order: H1 → H3 → H3. Meta title: missing. Indexable: no (noindex set).
Heading order: H1 → H2 → H3. Meta title: present and reviewed. Indexable: yes. Flagged for fix before publish.
Maya runs standards-backed technical checks and groups what she finds into clear categories with scores, so a person can see what matters and decide what to fix. She reviews, she does not change the page.
MAYA → Maya flags it before publish, so a page meant to be found is not quietly hidden from search.
She reports the broken hierarchy so the structure reads cleanly for readers, assistive tech and search.
Maya reviews the technical signals on a sample page so issues are caught once, not on every page later.
She checks that titles, headings and indexability still hold up after the edit.
Maya surfaces the technical signals that might be holding it back, for a person to investigate.
She groups findings by category and priority so the technical work is clear and scoped.
A technical review is information, not an instruction. Maya checks and reports, but she does not edit the page, change settings or push anything live. Her findings are for a person to act on.
Add Maya to your workflow and every page reaches review with its technical signals checked against standards.
