Content is full of claims: figures, comparisons, statements of fact. Some are solid, some are guesses, and some should not be published until they are checked. Theo gathers the evidence warnings raised across the workflow and turns them into a single, practical checklist of what to support, where to find it, and what to hold.
For editors and reviewers who want claims supported before approval, not after a reader, or a regulator, notices.
A confident sentence reads as fact whether or not anything backs it. Across a draft, unsupported figures and tidy-sounding comparisons slip through because no one is tracking which claim needs a source. Theo consolidates those gaps into one checklist, so nothing rests on an assumption no one checked.
↘ a precise number, no sourceOur method is proven to cut review time by 40% and is the most accurate on the market.
Flagged: "40%" needs a source or removal. "Most accurate" needs proof or rewording. Safe interim wording suggested.
Theo consolidates evidence warnings into a structured checklist: what needs support, a suggested source, the level of risk, whether it should block approval, and safe interim wording. The work of supporting a claim stays with people.
THEO → Theo flags the figure, marks it as needing a source, and suggests safe wording until one is found.
He surfaces "the best" or "the most accurate" as claims that need evidence or a rewrite before approval.
Theo pulls every unsupported claim into one checklist so a reviewer is not hunting for them line by line.
He marks the claims that should block approval until they are properly supported, and hands risk to Vera.
Theo confirms the evidence checklist is clear before Audrey assembles the approval report.
He coordinates with Alex so authority and evidence are both shown, not assumed.
Evidence is a human responsibility. Theo identifies what needs support and how risky each gap is, but he does not invent sources, fabricate figures or approve a claim. Filling and verifying the evidence stays with people.
Add Theo to your workflow and every page reaches review with its evidence gaps gathered into one clear checklist.
