Approval should not be a feeling. Before content moves forward, the editor needs to know whether the key checks are clean, whether blockers remain, and whether anything still needs revision, evidence or specialist review. Dana reads the existing worker outputs and produces a conservative approval gate. She does not approve automatically. She tells the human reviewer whether the content appears ready for review, needs revision, or is blocked.
For final editorial checks, approval workflows, CMS handoff preparation and content governance.
A page may have good copy, but still contain unresolved evidence gaps, accessibility issues, metadata problems, trust concerns, CMS handoff blockers or editorial risk. If those issues are scattered across worker outputs, they are easy to miss. Dana brings the final review state into one gate.
↘ check readiness before approvalThe draft looks ready, but evidence, metadata and accessibility checks still contain unresolved items.
Dana summarises readiness, blockers and next actions before the human editor approves.
Dana reviews already-computed worker outputs and determines whether the content appears ready for human editorial review. She does not certify compliance, publish content, or approve automatically.
DANA → Dana checks whether unresolved worker findings still block progress.
She combines the state into one clear readiness gate.
Dana flags blockers before handoff creates operational risk.
She gives approved-for-review only when the checks are clean enough.
Dana keeps risk, evidence and accessibility issues visible before sign-off.
She explains why and lists the highest-priority actions.
Dana does not approve content automatically, certify compliance, publish, or write to a CMS. Her job is to make the approval state visible so a human reviewer can decide.
Dana helps editors see whether content is ready for human approval, needs revision, or should be blocked before handoff.
